mysterydissertation: (Default)
UPDATE: I apparently have social media anxiety about dreamwidth (mostly the way the interface requires sustained writing and thinking and direct contact at all times) so I've made a WordPress blog where I'll be posting things about the Mystery Dissertation Project in a format that feels less stressful to me, as well as more accessible to my colleagues in academia. (Visit it here: https://mysterydissertationproject.home.blog.) I'll crosspost them here, too, though, and maybe someday I will do a better job of responding to the four or five people who are active on my reading page and who are all full of brilliant insights. <3



In the above image, Will Graham (NBC's Hannibal, 2013-2015) and Victorian spirit mediums (Annie Eva Fay, Florence Cook) stare with the same brooding eyes into some strange in-between realm that others cannot see. Their pale faces are made paler by their dark eyes and dark, mildly disheveled hair. Their lips are set in slight ambiguous curves; they look like they know something we don’t. And they are pretty. They are pretty in their vulnerability, their delicacy. They know how to wait; they know how to open themselves up to others. They are haunted by their remarkable capacities and the responsibilities and pains that come with them. They speak secret truths and suffer for it.

It is difficult to know how to write about two texts that are not from the same field of study. How does one compare a set of nineteenth-century accounts of Spiritualist séances with a twenty-first-century work of online erotic fanfiction about the television show Hannibal? In many ways, actually, it is not hard to talk about them in the same piece of writing. These texts center so many of the same questions about bodily agency, erotics, consent, constraint, pleasure and pain, insides and outsides. They can both be read productively through queer and feminist scholarship. They both require consideration of the tension between a potentially subversive queer approach to erotics and the conservative anchoring of that approach in whiteness.

But there are two major difficulties, one a matter of formal clarity and the other of institutional structures. How does one shuttle back and forth gracefully between two different subjects that each require in-depth analysis? And how does one justify why one is discussing contemporary fanfiction when one is meant to be a Victorianist, or why one is spending so much time relating a nineteeth-century text to a twenty-first century text if one is not writing a historicist genealogy of how we get from then to now? What jobs am I planning to apply to, anyway?

Yet I feel that these texts need to be read together. I feel it, more than I am capable of articulating in clear, scholarly language why. The ways in which I know how to express this need are less scholarly than they are…something else. So far, my best attempts are the picture above, and the beginning of a fic in progress below.

To be posted on Archive of Our Own under Lu Fairchild’s username (warning for explicit violence and non-sexual consent issues):

 Most mediums speak with the dead. Will Graham speaks with their killers.

That is what he is, Hannibal thinks, watching Will’s eyes move rapidly back and forth under his closed eyelids, beneath thin pale skin with blue-branching veins that Hannibal wants to trace with his fingernail. Will Graham is a medium. He opens his body like a conduit and lets the words and thoughts and deeds of others pour out. He channels bloodspatter and broken glass and arcing knives. Hannibal imagines the insides of his brain, capillaries and secret chambers, tinged dark red in the light of somebody else’s violence. Will calls up the spirits of the vicious and the depraved, ushering them back into the scenes of trauma they have made. Will conjures murder.

He has, Hannibal thinks, the same translucence as the sheeted ghostly figures in nineteenth-century spirit photographs, as if his contact with the intangible traces of those not present has left him half-opaque himself. Will is enormously strong, to contain these killers within him, and yet he is patently vulnerable, smudged-bruised shadows under his eyes, curls like a girl’s, twitches and trembles in his forehead and fingers. Hannibal wants to place his thumb into the hollow at Will’s white throat and press until red rises up to meet it.

---


Hannibal watches Will channel him—watches Will close his eyes and make pronouncements about the copycat killer, about the Chesapeake Ripper. About Hannibal.

Hannibal’s thoughts course through Will’s brain. His words fill up the hollows of Will’s cheeks and spill out of Will’s mouth. Will’s nightmares are garish with razor-sharp antlers and weapons piercing flesh. Will’s mind is blurring at the edges as Hannibal invades him slowly, secretly, under cover of night. He is losing himself in Hannibal.

Eyes unfocused, trembling, Will seizes in Hannibal’s dining room. Hannibal lies to him. Hannibal smoothes back his hair and clasps his glistening forehead, clinically, gently. Hannibal sends him out into the snow with a gun.

Hannibal inserts a rubber tube down Will’s throat. A tunnel, a passage, a surgical opening of the entrance to hell. Abigail’s ear shoved down the chute. She is a willing sacrifice, a sacrifice for Will. He consumes this synecdochical offering, this portion of their surrogate child, now truly flesh of their flesh, bone of their bone. Hannibal forces her down Will’s throat and now they are both in Will’s blood.

---


Will fights back.

---

In fighting back, Will becomes a killer. Will manipulates, deceives, worms and wriggles his way deep under Hannibal’s skin, a parasite Hannibal does not know how to extract. In fighting back, Will kills and sculpts a man who believes he is a monster into the monster of all their dreams. In fighting back, Will becomes, every day, more like Hannibal.

---


In the moonlight, blood looks black. Will, in the moonlight, streaked in blood, is beautiful.

“It’s beautiful,” he whispers, and the miracle has been accomplished. Hannibal’s thoughts, in Will’s brain, coming out of Will’s mouth. Beautiful.

Both of them drip blood, their own and the Great Red Dragon’s. They grip at each other. Flesh of my flesh.

Hannibal knows what Will is about to do just before he does it. Long enough to stop it, if he wanted to. Long enough to wrench himself away, split them down the middle. It wouldn’t be precise, now, not surgical, not clean. But he could do it. Sever them in two with a bloody ragged wound, and watch his other half fall into the sea.

But he doesn’t.

---

And they fall into the deep. And hell spits them back up.
 
mysterydissertation: (Default)

The novel portion of the Mystery Dissertation Project takes place at the fictional Schenley University in Pittsburgh. Because it’s a mystery novel, it’s been important to me to establish a small, distinct cast of characters at the start of my writing process. And since many of the characters are grad students, the way I decided to differentiate them was through the titles of their dissertations. (I don’t want to perpetuate the unhelpful tendency of grad students to locate their sense of self in their research, but…………)


These dissertation titles were very fun to write, largely because I don’t have to follow up with the actual dissertations. I tried to honor the contemporary trend of titling humanities projects, namely, INTERESTING PHRASE followed by a colon followed by WHAT I WANT MY SEARCH ENGINE KEYWORDS TO BE. (My friend Chelsea gives this formula to her undergrads when they get stuck writing essay titles.) I also tried to capture the academic’s love for questionable wordplay.


So! Announcing the narratively important grad students of Schenley University’s spectacularly dysfunctional English department:

Piper Ansell. “The Jewel in the Crown and the Crown Jewels: Sex, Race, and Precious Stones in c19 Colonial India”

Katie Lin. “fizz pop a dissertation in five acts”

Antonio Ramirez. “Marlowe Doesn’t Even Go Here: Early Modern Mean Girls”

Phoebe Koning. “Willa, Gertrude, and All My Bad Mothers”

Kevin Ng. "Ich bin ein Frankfurter: Food, Fascism, and the Frankfurt School”

Karen Gavras. “Before Lyme Regis: The Eighteenth-Century Prehistory of the Prehistoric”

Jack Hart. “Crooked Men: Disabling Masculinity in Victorian Britain”

Todd Burns. “Anaphora and Aporia in Shakespeare’s Romances”

and Lu Fairchild, whose dissertation title is TBA because I actually have to write this one.

mysterydissertation: (Default)
This was originally posted on the the tumblr of Lu Fairchild, the fictional character from my novel, with this comment: Here’s Lu, the fictional character whose dissertation I’m writing, thinking about that dissertation. Lu & I just finished a draft of a conference paper entitled “Murder Husbands and Spirit Grabbing: Navigating Consent Through Sex and Form” for the Dickens Universe Conference at UCLA in February. I’m excited to share more of these thoughts there!

I finished a draft of my conference paper on Hannibal fic & Victorian spiritualism! I feel like I’m moving closer to understanding what my project is and why it matters. like, it’s not a project “about” fic & Victorian literature. it’s a project about sex & form: about describing how sex takes on meaning and erotic charge via its formal properties. so, for example, in fic, anal fingering often takes on a particularly heavy burden of meaning-making, and that has everything to do with the fact that anal fingering is about penetrating into and stretching open a tight space that holds messy, vulnerable, even shameful contents. the form of that sex act is made to carry a particular emotional resonance and to do a particular kind of narrative work. not because it “naturally” does this, but because of how it’s represented in written and visual texts. sex in Hannibal fic, meanwhile, often echoes the show’s investment in much more radical transformations of the body: knifeplay, choking, biting, sex acts that are less about penetration into a closed space and more about consumption, transformation, and the blurring together of separate individuals.

and this MATTERS because of purity culture and the cultural renegotiation of consent and all those arguments about what is “good” representation and “good” fic. so, okay, look at the 80s and 90s, the debates about BDSM and porn and sex work. those were in part debates about what meaning sex acts carry. is penis-in-vagina sex always violent, as radical feminists argued, because it’s formally about breaching a closed space, like a battering ram breaching a gate? or do we need to conceptualize even acts like rape differently, like Sharon Marcus argues in “Fighting Bodies, Fighting Words,” so that we think of penises as fragile and we stop thinking of women as fortresses always vulnerable to attack? (this is a very cis-centric way of thinking gender, of course; that’s partly why we need new queer work on sex that considers and centers trans and nonbinary folks.) how does representation of sex–particularly, I think, the representation of the forms of sex–affect and reflect how we think through gender, sexuality, race, ability? not in a simple, transparent, direct way (i.e. good representation leads to good politics/“good” sex) but in a way that helps us understand why seemingly marginal sexual practices like BDSM or queer or non-monogamous sex are in fact vital and central to the way we make sex “mean.” and this matters so much right now because of purity culture, because of arguments against representations of “bad” sex, because of the wider cultural focus on rape and power dynamics, because of MeToo. at times like these, “marginal” forms of sex are the most likely to get thrown under the bus by both the right and the left. so at times like these, we need writing and scholarship that turns to sex–as in, the ways in which people have sex–to interrogate, once more, the way sex and representations of sex are at the heart of sexual and gender politics. and we need to think well beyond genitally centered straight cis sex when we think about sex and form and politics.

and why the Victorians? partly because they are such a touchstone in pop culture and scholarship around questions of sex, censorship, morality, and bodily autonomy. partly because it’s in that period that a lot of our current conceptualizations of bodies, gender, psychological interiority, agency, etc. come into being. but it’s mostly because we need to think about sex and form in all the periods and genres we study. it matters. it matters to us, right now, a lot.
mysterydissertation: (Default)
[originally posted on tumblr.]

I am obsessed with Tana French. I recently finished The Witch Elm, her latest mystery novel. As I read, I covered it in sticky notes, trying to figure out how French constructed it–what phrases and sentences piqued my interest? When did I feel the stakes getting higher? When did I suspect whom? What thematic questions and patterns of language was I noticing weaving it all together? I decided I wanted to write a little bit about what reading The Witch Elm reminded and revealed to me about what I love and want to emulate in my own mystery novel. These are those reminders:

1. Early on, introduce the idea that something is going to get really messed up, but do it by dropping hints that connect a vague looming catastrophe with a location, person, or event, not by starting off with an excerpt from later in the novel (as some mysteries do). It takes The Witch Elm FOREVER to get to the murder mystery, but very early on, the novel trains readers to think of Ivy House, the eventual location of the murder, as a place associated with tragedy and nostalgia. In the second paragraph of chapter one, the narrator says, I don’t think anyone could convince me, even now, that I was anything other than lucky to have the Ivy House. It’s that little aside–even now–that feels prophetic and mysterious and doom-laden and makes me want to read more.

2. Use the mystery genre to address thematic questions that it is ideally suited to consider. French is always asking big unanswerable questions in her mysteries–about memory, or home, or family, or madness–and she knows how the genre’s most basic elements (like violent acts, defamiliarizing the familiar, and not really knowing the people we think we know) work really really well to investigate these hugely complex and urgent questions. She also weaves issues of class, colonialism, heteronormativity, and the like so deeply into the mystery plots that if you tried to take them out, they would completely fray apart. In The Witch Elm, she’s asking questions about privilege and power by getting into the mind of a man who’s a classic “nice guy”: white, straight, oblivious, well-meaning. His encounters with violence and murder throw his confident, privileged sense of self into chaos. There are no easy answers about how much he learns and why he does what he does and what we think and feel about him in the end. The mystery plot wraps up, but, as always, French leaves us with the sense of larger questions unresolved. As in all her novels, the world never goes back to being a safe, knowable place.

3. Be interesting. Bizarre scenarios. Puzzling clues. Plenty of reveals. Lots of atmosphere. Let a skull fall out of the hole in a tree. Let the protagonist have to rethink his entire adolescence. Don’t get too hung up on being “realistic”–but do make sure the mystery plot comes together in cohesive and satisfying ways. French gets away with a lot of weird stuff because she makes it work, plot-wise (and because her prose is so ridiculously good).

4. Make us care about the characters. But let them do terrible things. We care about them more, not less, if they hurt us. Sometimes I hesitate to make characters I like do things that might make readers not like them anymore. But the mystery genre requires it–and these things raise the stakes, give us character insights, and break our hearts in satisfying ways. I want to avoid spoilers for French’s novel here, so I’ll just say that I was compelled, not simply repelled, by the characters who do bad things, because they are complex and fascinating and because, in complicated difficult ways, sometimes I found that I was still on their side.

5. Include those long, detail-rich descriptions of places and memories and people and feelings that you really want to write. Jasmine creepers swinging dizzily outside the window, back and forth. A watercolor off-kilter on the wall, swallows in a heart-stopping nosedive. Crazy slants of light across the table. Sensory descriptions can create atmosphere, add to the sense of urgency, guide readers to feel certain ways. They’re not boring–and they don’t just hold up the action. Don’t sacrifice prose style, description, reflection, or character building for the mystery plot.
mysterydissertation: (Default)
note: this was originally posted on tumblr, shortly before tumblr imploded. in advance of the no-NSFW changes on Dec. 17, which is pushing a lot of fandom and queer folks out, I decided I'd transfer my project to dreamwidth, at least for the time being.

Hi, it’s my dissertation!

Okay so: I’m working on my PhD and I’m writing a novel at the same time. The novel is about a dysfunctional English department and MYSTERY and MURDER and QUEER DETECTIVES. In the novel, a PhD student named Lu goes missing while she’s working on her dissertation about sex and ghosts and Victorian women and fanfiction.

For my dissertation, I’m writing HER dissertation. The project, overall, is: novel, dissertation, fanfiction supposedly written by Lu, and this blog. Also, a tumblr supposedly run by Lu. [ETA: not sure if that's going to keep happening--I'll post updates here.] My plan is to update this blog with posts about the process, excerpts from the novel and scholarly writing, and related source materials. I’m hoping to interact with all sorts of interested folks here and to share at least some of my work with the communities it engages with, both scholarly and fannish. More info can be found in the About section!

Navigating multiple identities and modes of discourse online, especially in the intersections of fandom and academia, is so weird and difficult, and as I go I’ll be trying to work out what’s best for me and for the communities I’m part of. let me know, especially fan/tumblr folks, if you have thoughts about this. <3

If you’re interested in queer stuff, murder mysteries, academia, Victorian ghosts, critical theory, fic, fan studies, grad school, and/or experimental writing, follow this blog or send me an ask! I can’t follow back because this is a side blog, just fyi, but I will definitely engage with comments etc. THANKS YOU ARE GREAT.

love, miranda

Profile

mysterydissertation: (Default)
mysterydissertation

June 2019

S M T W T F S
      1
23456 78
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30      

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Aug. 8th, 2025 08:03 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios